Overview

Design review gets complicated fast when multiple consultants are in the drawings. Markups pile up across disciplines, ownership gets murky, and resolution tracking falls apart.

This community-led workflow discussion is for architecture teams who want to talk honestly about how they’re managing coordinated review in Bluebeam — what’s working, what isn’t, and how other firms are handling it.

What We’ll Cover:

• How a structured Studio Session setup supports multi-discipline review
• Markup ownership and status tracking across consultant sets
• What a review closeout looks like when it works
• Open discussion: how are your teams running coordinated review right now?

Key Takeaways:

• A concrete example of one structured multi-party review workflow in Revu
• Practical approaches to markup ownership and resolution tracking
• Honest peer comparison — what other architecture teams are actually doing 

Beneficial for:

• Project architects, design technology leads, BIM managers, CAD managers, and anyone at an architecture firm who touches the review and coordination process — from intern to principal.

Details:

• 📅 Date: Friday, July 24
• 🕛️ Time: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm CDT
• 💻️ Where: Virtual meeting | Register for details

Why attend this meeting/session?

• Attend & receive complimentary tips from Bluebeam’s workflow consultant experts!
• Presented by the Bluebeam team with open discussion!:
  • Erik Schonsett, Manager | Consulting Services
  • Charles Todd, Workflow Consultant II

Important information:

• Space is limited!

• Workflows Talks aren’t webinars; they’re interactive sessions and group discussions with Bluebeam’s workflow experts and your peers!

  This is an exclusive perk of being an online Bluebeam Community member, so you must be a member of our online Community to register and attend. View the Community & register now!